skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
A Novel Proposition
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
correction to last post
Sorry. Premise 4 below should read:
4) ~ [(2) & (3)]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Online Course Readings
Jeffrey King, "Structured Propositions"
Gregory Fitch and Michael Nelson, "Singular Propositions"
Cian Dorr, "There Are No Abstract Objects"
Matthew McGrath, "Propositions"
Kent Bach, "Do Belief Reports Report Beliefs?"
Michael Jubien, "Propositions and the Objects of Thought"
Michael McKinsey, "The Semantics of Belief Ascription"
Daniel Nolan, "Impossible Worlds: A Modest Approach"
Takashi Yagisawa, "Beyond Possible Worlds"
Nathan Salmon, "Impossible Worlds" (JSTOR)
Scott Soames, "Why Propositions Can't be Sets of Truth-Supporting Circumstances"
Gottlob Frege, "On Concept and Object" (Mind)
Gottlob Frege, "Negation" (JSTOR)
Bertrand Russell, "The Principles of Mathematics Chapter IV: Proper Names, Adjectives, and Verbs"
Bertrand Russell, "The Philosophy of Logical Atomism"
Kevin Klement, "Russell's Logical Atomism"
Friederike Moltmann, "Propositional Attitudes Without Propositions"
Scott Soames, "The Unity of the Proposition"
Jeffrey Speaks, "Facts, Properties, and the Unity of the Proposition"
Online Philosophy Resources
James Pryor Guidelines on Reading Philosophy
James Pryor Guidelines on Writing a Philosophy Paper
James Pryor Intro to Philosophical Terms and Methods
Philosophy Compass
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Blog Archive
▼
2008
(76)
►
December
(1)
▼
November
(17)
correction to last post
King on propositions and changing truth values
Harry D.
C1 and C2 wonder
The Guy's Talk
New Readings
Proto-intentional states intuition pump
Distant Past Wonder
King's good intentions.
Wonder
A Thought Out Loud
Is King's account too fined grained?
'Elementary' trouble with King
Paradox of Analysis
a couple of snags for King
King's response to objection 2
King: The Objection from Origins.
►
October
(25)
►
September
(33)
No comments:
Post a Comment